God’s Chosen People

Why is the World so Perilous?

Many perceive us to be “advanced” as a species, yet there’s so much chaos and heinousness in the world, that it makes many wonder—what exactly is going on here? If indeed we are so “advanced” as many will preach, why the conflict? Why world hunger? Why anything negative?! Why can’t we all just be happy?

Many point the finger to corporations, international bankers, cultural Marxism, the military-industrial complex, globalization, patriarchy, and a slew of other boogeymen. But as dedicated as they are to uncovering the truth, they’re falling for smoke and mirrors. Decoys set up by the victors of the most deadly conflict in human history. The post-war world is one of lies, deception, and nearly a century of cover-ups, scandals, genocides, and international espionage. If one truly seeks to understand the underlying cause of all of this, looking into the other side of WWII is essential.

Sefirot – a doctrine of Judaism



Jews are inherently secular“, meaning that what they believe is right and wrong changes, depending on the situation. They are an ideology of supremacy as well, framing the world populations as strictly that of two: Jews and non-Jews (gentiles, goyim).[1]


To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.


You probably know where I’m going with this by now and might feel inclined to leave a comment like, “but know good Jews.” As in, Jews that treat everyone fairly and are honest, hard-working people. But before you do, consider the following:

Christianity—is Judaism, reformed. Most involved with the genesis of Christianity and its prominence during Christendom (including Christ himself) wanted something new out of Judaism.[2]

Catholicism, Protestantism, Calvinism, Mormonism, and other non-Orthodox “denominations” of Christianity—are called reform Christianity, for a reason. It’s reforming Christianity back into Judaism, an ideology dating back to around 7th century BC when we were savages, and naturally wanted a belief system that taught us to stand our ground, in the face of rampant tribalism and uncertainty towards the forces of nature.[3]

Civilization eventually settled however and people grew tired of the egotism at its core, particularly because it led to countless wars and conflict and still does to this day. They wanted a new belief system that from birth would crank out clever, altruistic, cooperative people who didn’t make needless enemies everywhere they went. They wanted to destroy the ego.[4]

And so you see, when one is told, “don’t believe any of that ‘antisemitic garbage’, I’ve met plenty of decent Jews,” what they speak of are really closeted Christians. They may act like us. It doesn’t change the fact that they’re free to be selective with the doctrines of their scripture at will, as long as it plays the goyim’s disadvantage.




Christianity delineates no such others in this fashion and considers everyone, non-Christians included to be God’s children, worthy of basic respect and dignity. A Christian will never harm you willfully.[5] A Jew might. Because nothing about their holy text is meant to benefit all of mankind, as is in the case of the Bible and possibly the original version of the Quran, which was wiped out and revised heavily by the caliph Uthman.

What he ended up revising it into and from becomes quite clear if one pays particular attention to the demographical shifts going on before, during, and after the Quran’s conception in Mecca around 610 AD.




(((Pagans))) essentially persecuted Muhammed and his people with the classic divide and conquer, psychological warfare routine, leading to the conception of the Quran—which sought to capitalize largely off of the gospel[6] and bring providence together again; however, the version systemically pumped out over millennia by Uthman—has far more in common with the teachings of the Torah, Talmud, and Kabbalah. If Muhammed could see what “Islam” is today, he’d roll over in his grave. Ever since its inception, Islam has led to mostly, dismal, counterproductive, war-waging empires that conquer their surroundings by the sword to sustain themselves.[7]

And that is something to expect when your religion is corrupted by another ideology with more reach, resources, and intensely deep-rooted supremacist attitudes.[8] It will of course only come to serve as a proxy or decoy for said ideology’s agenda. As hard as it is to tell Muslims this to their face, their religion is mostly fraudulent.

Paganism can be thought of the first reformed Christianity; the first one to take prominence in a world superpower that is. Recall, if you will what I said earlier: reform Christians indeed as Wikipedia mocks aren’t Christian.

Terrorism and Islam are inherently related, but it is not the fault of Islam itself, the people who initially conceived of it, or Muslims themselves. Islam is yet another decoy, folks. A pivotal one marking the end of Christendom (a mostly Christian world) and the beginning pieces of the classical end-times scenario, covered extensively in Jewish holy texts.

A scenario in which most Jews will be safe in their homeland (which is Israel, a country currently building borders and putting up mandatory DNA testing for entrance) and the gentiles will suffer in the outer Israeli, globalist cage like the cattle they’ve been seen as all along.


Jews As a Race

In sequence tree form, from the emergence of mankind to the modern day, racially it goes Blacks > Reds > Yellows > Whites > Jews. Blacks came out of Africa, their skin lightened a little; they became Red. Some of those reds migrated to cooler areas and became yellow. With each cooler migration, the races began to get more civilized. Yellows (Asians) would end up ruling the planet for some time with their intelligence and perseverance. Smart as they were, many migrated to the Caucus mountains to experience peak cooling and thus peak civilization. These Yellows of course Whitened and the rest is history.

But like all racial groups throughout history, whites are no different than any other when it comes to infighting. Civilized though we may call ourselves, we all have our “prejudices”. Some whites didn’t care for this nu-found Western way of life and chose to migrate back to the Middle East and indulge in their outdated, hedonistic lifestyles—which overtime turned them into genetic monstrosities.

Jews are an ethnoreligious group (a sub-race, if you will) Ethno is racial in this context. It is a race of people (in this case, whites) engaging in the same religion. Christians are an ethnoreligious group, also. They don’t all act the same. Many Christians sin and many non-sinners don’t identify as Christian. As with Jews, we’re a “gray area” as well. The difference is our intention. Jews want a world for themselves, whereas Christians want a world for everybody.


It’s true though. We’ve all got the “bigotry” bug; we all need to get off our high horse about that.

The reason it is often stated that race is “nothing more” than a social construct, is because it’s the biological phenomenon of genetic division among a species and we are social creatures. Therefore, most racial divisions occur because of differing behavior, environment shifts, and other supposed free choices we make. But is this variation freely chosen?

What is free will?

Can you even describe it? Something free is uncontrolled; Something willed is completely controlled. Science has no who, what, when, where, or why of any such “free will”. If anything, we’ve gradually disproven it by providing more and more explanations overtime for phenomena we had once attributed to “free will”.

What was the last thought you had? Did you choose it? How’d you do it? Did you think about what you wanted to think? And what made you do that?! Do you have free will, or has a chain of intellectually lacking “wills” infected you with the notion?

Still not convinced? Consider the following questions and your answers.

  1. Would you agree, like most people, that we are part of nature? That is to say, not separate from it, and in fact—entirely dependent on it?
  2. Would you agree, like most people, that ants are a part of nature?
  3. Would you describe the behavior of ants as robotic? If not, how about bacteria? It’s just cells. All it can do is spread mindlessly. It’s as close to a pure automaton of nature as we can get. But keep in mind, bacteria—like you is just another part of nature, right?
  4. Speaking of bacteria, wouldn’t you agree that all of this complexity in the animal kingdom had to emerge from something? A cell or two, maybe?

If you answered yes to all or most of these questions, then I’ve got a question: what are you? If you ask me, you’re nothing more than a heavily advanced version of bacteria. You wanna know where the idea of free will comes from? Quite simply, our hubris. The ego is a powerful thing, as it should be, for it served an evolutionary purpose during our daily struggle for survival. But it has since become outdated and its promise people, those who seek to reinvigorate and keep it alive the most—are Jews.


Who Shot First?

Judea Declares War On Germany, a 1933 newspaper said in response to Germany crawling out from under the heel of international bankers. For they knew not that Germany would “take over the world”, but that Germany’s restored ideals (nationalism, family, tradition, etc.) would soon usurp the globe and bring the private banking industry down.

Globalism vs. Nationalism

Hitler didn’t reach enough people in time for international Jews not to start using their accumulated financial power across the globe to turn public opinion against Germany, setting into motion so many events of instigation, intimidation, mass-rapings in Germany, sanctions, and so on, that she had no choice but to “declare war” on the Allied Forces. The Japanese were similarly frightened into involvement in the events that took place during “Pearl Harbor”. The Axis were the good guys. That’s why we live in a hate-filled, divisive, and oppressive world that rewards Machiavellianism and antisociality. Nobody knows who they are anymore. WWII was a battle of ideas. Nationalism vs. Globalism; Diversity vs. Assimilation; Many Cultures vs. One that can easily be controlled.

It also touches upon the paradox that is our wide-spread misconception of collectivism and individualism. The combination of characteristics and traits associated with all the collectives you belong to, the uniqueness of your’s in comparison to others’, is what makes you an “individual”. Collectivists are the true individuals, each belonging to a variety of different groups in their own respects. “Individualists”, on the other hand, are ironically all the same. They think values are all that matter and while they are important, where the values come from is just as important, if not more so.



Concentration / “Death” Camps

The camps in Europe during WWII were not death camps, nor did they function as oppressive facilities to milk communists in Germany for all they were worth, then throw them in the meat grinder. National Socialist Germany wanted communists to move, yes. But they didn’t want to just dispose of those who didn’t leave. So they essentially created neat, little, make-shift, communist communities for them, out of the camps.

These camps had cafeterias, hospitals, beds, dentistry, maternity wards, currency. The “prisoners” of these camps lived exactly the kind of life they longed for. Nobody owned anything; yet everyone had access to whatever they needed, and they were happy. Even long before these camps were implemented, Germany attempted (mostly with success) to relocate the communists into neighboring countries that were more than willing to accept their integration, as was “evil” Germany more than happy to finance it.

Germany was the foremost superpower in Europe at the time. Hence, if any of her neighbors were in dire trouble, she was the one to step in and help. This is why there were camps not just in Germany, but some in Poland, Austria, etc. Because many countries in Europe at the time were experiencing absolutely horrific Soviet purges. “Prisoners” of these camps were “kidnapped” from a life of constant uncertainty and chaos and taken into boxed communities that took care of them.

On the other hand, guess who did have and in fact, invented concentration camps.

British and German Jews in South Africa.


Typhus, a skin-eating disease with no cure at the time, spread itself through bugs, lice, and microorganisms, an issue commonly expected when dealing with crowds of people in constant close proximity to one another. The only way to contain the virus was to shower, sanitize, shave everyone regularly and burn their clothes (in ovens) if they weren’t salvageable. If they were salvageable, they had to be sprayed first with the delousing agent, Zyklon-B.

This stuff was deadly to put it lightly and certainly not the kind of thing you wanted to be left uncontained, which would make it the perfect weapon to use in war, wouldn’t it? How might one use it? Well, here’s an idea. How about we (the Allies) bomb the hell out of German supply bases and medical facilities, to deprive and ultimately shut down administration within the camps, leading to—well, chaos. Better yet, let’s just bomb their whole country with phosphorus fires all over, so that even those who survive somehow—will roam for a while, then starve to death. Seems like a solid plan to me.

Then after we occupy their camps, we’ll alter them. Take old photographs and footage of them; edit those as well. The goal really is: make our enemies look terrible. Nothing is too extreme.









Globalism / Israel

Everything Hitler predicted in Mein Kampf about a globalist world has largely come to pass and the Jewish homeland “Israel” fittingly enough is at the heart of the storm. Abolition of religion, abandoning of all culture, centralizing of communication, education, and everything holding our precious, various cultures together on their own merits. It cannot be understated; the broader society we all suffer through today isn’t like communism. It is communism.






Chinese Warming

4) “Climate change” alarmism. No matter how much contradicting evidence is presented or how divided the scientific community is global imperialists always express 100% certainty in “climate change” and “global warming” theories. They virtually never question it and they usually insist on reacting to the worst case scenario hypothesis. This is of particular importance in their ideology because it creates a fear-based imperitive to bring all the nations of the world under the economic and political control of “internationalist” institutions.

–Globalist Traits, Rob Ager, March 2011









Why Did We Let it Happen?

We didn’t. They tricked us, folks. It all goes back to usury. We keep borrowing, thus indebting ourselves, but never asking, “when is it going to be enough?” Jews know how to exploit this weakness. Democracy is a scam to give you the illusion of choice, when the bankers have already pre-determined the outcome EVERY TIME by funding and not funding whoever they wish.


National Socialism

A Truly Diverse Ideology

No two national socialist societies were, are, or will ever be alike. Yet all communist and anarchist societies seemingly fall down the same path, no matter how they approach their system, which let’s be honest–doesn’t vary much. There are not very many ways to have no society, and there’s just as few ways to run a society that takes everything from everyone by force. There is practically an infinite number of ways, however, to run a national socialist system, for at the core of national socialism is: the nation; the people. It is the one true “democracy” if ever there were such a system that you could describe as such.

Natsoc isn’t subject to the same potential corruption as today’s “democratic” societies, for if a banker or any corporate entity attempts to overstep their boundaries, they will fail. If people wish to conduct business in natsoc societies, the business must serve the nation in some measurable way and not take more than it gives. Societies that allow such businesses to operate, regardless of usefulness are called capitalist systems and such systems are a catalyst for (((globalism))), much like international socialism (communism) would be. Any international entity for that matter, as well as any that operates under market fundamentalism (deregulation), will naturally and necessarily overstep its boundaries and become a world superpower, putting every other smaller territory under its heel.

Now, when I say that natsoc is in the center of the left and the right, I’m not necessarily insinuating that it’s a “centrist” ideology. What I’m getting at is much bigger than that. Once one truly grasps what national socialism really is, they’ll understand that there is no such thing as the left or the right. Those are terms invented by divisive people who have been led into living in systems they don’t like, because they’ve been heavily influenced by global powers that want them to be divisive, to buy things they don’t need with money they don’t have, and to spend 1/3 of their daily waking hours absorbing news media. The left is just a melting pot one swims in all day, every day until they eventually become a communist; the same goes for the right and anarchy.

Would you rather have as oppressive a society as possible, no society at all, or a functional one?


Most civilized societiesare white. In that, they’re made by whites, for whites. Civilized in that they have an infrastructure, hygiene, schools, research, automation, central heating, air conditioning, refrigeration, plumbing, shelter, housing, agriculture, manufacturing, news media, entertainment, churches, distinct cultural music and art, engineers, scientists, functional nuclear families, unity among class and sub-culture, and so on.

Once one realizes how white supremacy truly works, most won’t take issue with it. In fact, they’ll immediately come to realize that they’ve been a “white supremacist” for longer than they thought. For it is quite simple. We, whites—have taken and “pillaged” all that we have in this world throughout history, by killing our enemies with one thing: altruism; Christianity. Our egolessness. Kindness, if you will.

Our people are amazing. The world we live in today with all our neat gadgets and obvious authority status over nature—is a mostly white invention. Non-whites can never repay us for this, if we did ever come to collect the debt that is, which we won’t, because that very humbleness is what makes us white, on the inside. Egyptians, Persians, North Americans, Mesopotamians, Indians, Chinese, Mongolians, Japanese, Incans, Mayans, Aztecs, Peruvians, Iranians, Iraqis, Bosnians, and especially Palestinians were all once visited some time ago by what many of them called, “giant, white Gods” from the mountains (Caucasia), before the peak of all of their civilizations. Why did they all collapse, and why so quickly (say in the span of about a century or two, every time)? They sent whites packing and often slaughtered them. It’s the same story, every time.

And part of that sadly is our fault. Because we are so kind and brotherly with our fellow man, we often mingle, work, and eventually mate with any surrounding minorities, such that—demographical change, in the long run, is inevitable without state intervention. And once few enough people are white on the outside, there won’t be enough who are white on the inside to keep society running functionally. It will collapse without us; make no mistake. As a non-white, if you care about your people, you should be every bit a “white supremacist”, as we are. Because any world absent of our people is a perilous, virtually uninhabitable one for the rest of you.


That no rape culture thing is not an exaggeration. There was indeed no rape culture, no homeless slums, no neighborhoods of single mothers. None of those societal ills we’ve come disgustingly to just accept everywhere we are. The one true eutopia is the one most strongly discouraged and looked down upon.

It can’t be that shocking.

Dispelling a Myth

Nationalism is “Supremacy”

Supremacy means “nationalism for you, but globalism for everyone else.” But as I just explained, “white” supremacy doesn’t work like that. There’s only one group of people with an abundance of power that behaves in a truly supremacist fashion openly.

Jews Control the World

This would be problematic in the case of cultural hegemony of any kind because it would bend several delicate, unique peoples and systems over to the will of one master, which is just patently unethical. It is even extra harmful, however, given our circumstance because Jews don’t exercise their power out in the open. They craft boogeymen for us to chase after like sheep, by spending their money very meticulously. Anticipating the damage, they then fund the cleanup crew, and it’s a never-ending cycle of chaos and recovery—all of which they profit from. But it’s more than just profiting from it. They outright engineer it, most of the time.

Understanding that they can’t not do this—that their ideology is inherently supremacist and depends on creating conflict perpetually to sustain itself, is important.


Let’s say you and I are acquaintances and you need $30. Suppose I give you $30, under the expectation that you’ll give me $30 back at some point. This–is what’s called a loan.

Now, suppose instead that we’re not very well acquainted and I decide that if you want my $30 now, you have to give me $35 next week, and if not–$40 the next, and so on. You might be familiar with this process; you might also think this is a loan, or at least some special type of loan. It’s not. I’m not “loaning” you money out of the kindness of my heart. Your bills, your child’s braces, and wife’s breast cancer treatment mean less than nothing to me. I’m using you and your unfortunate financial situation to make money for myself. If you hadn’t yet, perhaps you see now why the Catholic church banned it for so long,.

Usury is any kind of lending that enriches the lender. Understanding its role goes a long way toward understanding how Jewish supremacy is sustained and what to do about it as a society.

Imagine, If You Will

a World of Thelema

This one time, I was taking a stroll across town, when I saw a Thelemite. I could tell he probably was one because he had a shirt on of that famous Aleister Crowley picture with the Eye of Horus. I walked up to him, pushed him down, stuck my foot in his mouth, and starting kicking him viciously in the testicles. He cried, naturally. I asked what was wrong and he said, “you’re hurting me,” to which I smirked and remarked, “hurting you? Sir, this is my will, and it shall be done. Now, quit oppressing me,” to which he responded graciously, “oh, right,” and continued receiving the ass-beating that had begun moments ago.

I went back to his house; I could tell it was his house, cause he had an Ozzy Osbourne memorial on his porch. I let myself in and used my second brain to put his wife in a choke hold if you know what I’m saying. He walked in shortly before I came; he was not amused. But I repeated the same line to him as I did earlier. “Sir, it is my will. If you interfere, you’re suggesting that your will is superior to mine. Don’t tread on me.” He sighed, looked down in shame, and said, “right,” after which I continued thrusting, moaning, and relieving myself.

I tore up a dollar bill and left it in his mailbox. The (((mailman))) found it the next morning and now would probably be a good time to mention—this guy is black. Needless to say, there was a warrant for his arrest and a battering ram headed for his doorstep hours later. He was shaking; I think one of the cops inadvertently shot his daughter in the face when a bullet ricocheted into her after bouncing off a quoted Maya Angelou picture frame. So he was furious to put it lightly.

But on that faithful court day, when it was my turn to take the stand I said, “your honor, have not we heard the Law of Thelema in this court?” to which everyone, including the judge, responded in gasps, hushed whispers, and looks of bewilderment. The black Thelemite, who was now wearing a Black Lives Matter shirt, was sitting in the defendant seat with his face in his hands, looking absolutely defeated.

An explanation for all the

“Hygienics” in the story there

The Law of Thelema holds the individual will of each of its adherents to be divine law. A true Thelemite will not question the will of anyone else, even if it conflicts with theirs. They can act in their “own will” to defend themselves of course. But they can’t be upset with you in good faith for trying to wrong you as a Thelemite; for if they did, they would fail to understand what Aleister Crowley taught. To let go of morality.

Now, what’s the difference between a Thelemite, which let’s be real here is nothing more than a Satanist attempting to come off as more “philosophical”, and a Jew? Well, Thelemites think they’re God. Deep within Aleister Crowley (the first Thelemite) was a detachment from reality. This is due to the innate fact that nothing seems to exist outside of perception, which seems to only exist within our minds, hence–it’s impossible to know whether or not anything is real. Because he wasn’t sure he was real, he assumed he was God, genuinely. That he was solely responsible for keeping this “world” together that he was nearly convinced was all in his head.

A Jew knows there’s a God. As do Christians.

Ya see a Christian thinks that life is a test. A test of what: faith.

Jew thinks they are testing life. Testing what about it: its stability.

Deep within Thelema, you’ll encounter people like Elon Musk, who suggest that if anything–we aren’t real; that if indeed we are to reach a level of sophistication one day where we’ll be able to create life from scratch and become God in a sense, then that’s probably already happened. Many, many times. Musk thinks that we’re not only living in a “simulation” but that our “simulators” are living in one as well, as are their’s and so on.

It truly takes an unbelievable amount of narcissism and willful ignorance of the suffering of others for someone to have this solipsistic worldview. It’s disgusting. I don’t get how such people are unable to look around them and see that others go through the same struggles, trials, and tribulations that they do. That they bleed, cry, and have urges just like them. That they too feel like they are the main character of the universe in a sense. It’s called sonder, and it’s the key to stepping out of this cancerous, “individualist” mindset.

Everything your ancestors have built must be preserved if you are to have a future for your grandchildren, great grandchildren and so on. In order to do that, you must not give into the divisive mechanisms being peddled to us by our Israeli puppet masters.






























Tomato Bubble

Huge Questions

Globalist Traits


Trump Hate Map

The Federal Reserve

Murdered South Africans

Macrocosmic Thinking


Comments are closed.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: